|
|
|
|
|
09-06-2012, 01:31 AM
|
#1
|
|
|
|
Intrepid Newbie |
Join Date: Jul 2012 |
Location:
Tulsa,OK |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2000 |
Model: Base |
Posts:
5 |
|
|
|
|
17 inch rims...
I have some 17's im wanting to put on my trep, what size of tire should i replace the stock 225/60R16s with?
....What about if i wanted to go to low profile?
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by SyFy_Serpent; 09-06-2012 at 01:34 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
09-06-2012, 01:35 AM
|
#2
|
|
|
|
Mopar MacGyver |
|
|
Join Date: May 2008 |
Location:
Ocala Fl |
|
|
|
|
Year: 1997 |
Model: Sport 3.5L |
Color: Black |
Posts:
8,129 |
|
|
|
|
225/55/r17
|
|
|
|
|
09-06-2012, 02:03 PM
|
#3
|
|
|
|
Intrepid Newbie |
Join Date: Jul 2012 |
Location:
Tulsa,OK |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2000 |
Model: Base |
Posts:
5 |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that, Cyrpt.
Anyone got the size for Low- Profiles?
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 12:37 PM
|
#4
|
|
|
|
Intrepid Modder |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012 |
Location:
Lancaster / Palmdale |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2004 |
Model: Intrepid |
Color: Silver |
Posts:
316 |
|
|
|
|
225/55/17 sounds like the best choice.. I've seen 17" rims with lowpros on Intrepids and in my opinion they just don't look right. Mainly because there's still a lot of space between the wheel well. 18"s with lowpros look a lot better but again that's MY opinion. To each his own, right?
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 12:57 PM
|
#5
|
|
|
|
get off my lawn |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006 |
Location:
Smyrna , Tn |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2002 |
Model: 300M Special |
Color: PS2 |
Posts:
13,921 |
|
|
|
|
low pros on a LH make it ride like a kidney buster,,
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 01:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
|
Intrepid Modder |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012 |
Location:
Lancaster / Palmdale |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2004 |
Model: Intrepid |
Color: Silver |
Posts:
316 |
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by DrDodge
low pros on a LH make it ride like a kidney buster,,
|
|
Do they affect mileage? I've done research online and I've read that they negatively affect MPG and that it's recommended to "re-gear" the tranny, not sure what that means or how to do it.. Mind you, yes, they look good but it's like you're sacrificing drivetrain for looks.
|
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 01:00 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
|
Intrepid Newbie |
|
Join Date: Oct 2012 |
Location:
Florida |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2002 |
Model: SE |
Color: Black |
Posts:
17 |
|
|
|
|
What about 215/65R17???? would this work also????
|
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 01:13 PM
|
#8
|
|
|
|
1st Gen FTW - It's AutoMedic! |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008 |
Location:
Garrison, ND |
|
|
|
|
Year: 1994 |
Model: Intrepid ESi |
Color: Indy Red Clear PRB |
Posts:
15,412 |
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by el_charal
Do they affect mileage? I've done research online and I've read that they negatively affect MPG and that it's recommended to "re-gear" the tranny, not sure what that means or how to do it.. Mind you, yes, they look good but it's like you're sacrificing drivetrain for looks.
|
|
The trans in the LH only has two gearing options - 3.66:1 (3.x), and 3.89:1 (2.7 and the Special (I think?)). If your overall outside diameter stays the same, then you shouldn't have to change gearing, except if for some reason there isn't enough grunt to get that much outer inertia spinning.
In the case of the LH - I think it is going to be a choice of form over function - you can either have it look, or perform, when it comes to the wheels.
EDIT: there are Prolwer Pro gears - not sure what ratio they are though - they are numerically higher than 3.89:1 though.
|
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 01:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
|
|
Intrepid Pro |
|
Join Date: Nov 2008 |
Location:
Greater Pittsburgh, PA |
|
|
|
|
Year: 2002 |
Model: Intrepid "Superbee" |
Color: PEL Sechs |
Posts:
14,563 |
|
|
|
|
Aren't Prowler pros 4:10s?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using AutoGuide App
|
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 01:43 PM
|
#10
|
|
|
|
1st Gen FTW - It's AutoMedic! |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008 |
Location:
Garrison, ND |
|
|
|
|
Year: 1994 |
Model: Intrepid ESi |
Color: Indy Red Clear PRB |
Posts:
15,412 |
|
|
|
|
The ratio stated on the only Prowler Pro stuff I could easily find said something like 2.94 - but I think that yes, 4.10 is correct for the same comparison point. The only cost I could find was a "summer special" of like 1500 bucks, but includes a speed converter box.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|