I've posted about this before and I'll do it yet again. These are all stats from magazines so don't argue about it.
I hit 140mph in my 94 3.5L
I have confirmed my run was accurate according to R&T January 1994
Dodge Intrepid ES -=>140mph Top speed 3.5L
Eagle Vision ESi -=>125mph (3.3L)
Eagle Vision TSi -=>130mph (3.5L)
Chrysler LHS -=>112mph (3.5L)
It says the LHS was electronically limited, not the others
Therefore it is possible that drag is limiting our top speed's not a govenor. My car was at 4000rpm's at 140mph that was right after the transmission shifted to 4th and the torque converter disengaged. The car, at 4000rpms did not have enough power to accelerate. It took awhile before it shifted from 3rd to 4th to suggest drag was taking a major toll on the car's acceleration.
Alright I got more info
For you R/T people this is something you might want to know for more top speed:
The 1998 300M's had an unrestricted top speed of 143mph
The 1999 300M had a governed top speed of 118mph.
Who knows, an ECU swap would give you more a few more HP/Torque and a lot more speed
For the rest of us:
---------------------------------------------
From Car & Driver June 1999
The 1998 Intrepid (10Best List Info)
2.7L top speed 116mph (governed)
3.2L top speed 119mph (governed)
The 1999 Concorde LX 118mph
it doesn't say if any car on the list are governed
---------------------------------------------
From Car & Driver June 1995
1994 Intrepid 111mph (I'm asumming it's not an ES because the 0-60 time is 9.5sec)
Once again it doesn't say if any of the cars on the list are governed
---------------------------------------------
If any of you want 0-60 times and other performance info on various years I'll post it.
The 300M info proves my theory about drag and it's effects on our cars (in my opinion)
There ya go, any questions? e-mail me
I hit 140mph in my 94 3.5L
I have confirmed my run was accurate according to R&T January 1994
Dodge Intrepid ES -=>140mph Top speed 3.5L
Eagle Vision ESi -=>125mph (3.3L)
Eagle Vision TSi -=>130mph (3.5L)
Chrysler LHS -=>112mph (3.5L)
It says the LHS was electronically limited, not the others
Therefore it is possible that drag is limiting our top speed's not a govenor. My car was at 4000rpm's at 140mph that was right after the transmission shifted to 4th and the torque converter disengaged. The car, at 4000rpms did not have enough power to accelerate. It took awhile before it shifted from 3rd to 4th to suggest drag was taking a major toll on the car's acceleration.
Alright I got more info
For you R/T people this is something you might want to know for more top speed:
The 1998 300M's had an unrestricted top speed of 143mph
The 1999 300M had a governed top speed of 118mph.
Who knows, an ECU swap would give you more a few more HP/Torque and a lot more speed
For the rest of us:
---------------------------------------------
From Car & Driver June 1999
The 1998 Intrepid (10Best List Info)
2.7L top speed 116mph (governed)
3.2L top speed 119mph (governed)
The 1999 Concorde LX 118mph
it doesn't say if any car on the list are governed
---------------------------------------------
From Car & Driver June 1995
1994 Intrepid 111mph (I'm asumming it's not an ES because the 0-60 time is 9.5sec)
Once again it doesn't say if any of the cars on the list are governed
---------------------------------------------
If any of you want 0-60 times and other performance info on various years I'll post it.
The 300M info proves my theory about drag and it's effects on our cars (in my opinion)
There ya go, any questions? e-mail me