DodgeIntrepid.Net Forums banner

Fix For Common 42LE Transmission No Reverse Problem

1 reading
24K views 10 replies 3 participants last post by  pt500  
#1 · (Edited)
This may be helpful for those with the no reverse condition. The symptoms are typically that all other gears work fine, but there is no reverse or significant slipping in reverse. If you put the front end on secure jack stands with the wheels free to turn, they may turn in reverse gear, but with little torque. (Obviously, for safety when doing this, put some type of chocks on the rear wheels. On cars where a cable-type parking brake only engages the rear wheels you can set that also.)

PART NUMBER NOTE: Sometime after the 1st Gen Parts Catalogs were issued, Chrysler later started adding a zero (0) to the front of the part numbers for some reason. So in searching for parts like those listed here you've got to do it with both the zero and without. Searches won't always get a hit if you just search without the zero.

This repair involves removing the valve body and replacing the old low/reverse accumulator cover (04431617 or 4431617) and O-ring with an updated one-piece cover that has a Viton sealing lip bonded to the bottom (04431617AB or 4431617AB, "Cover, Accumulator" part still available). You could also replace the the two sealing rings on the accumulator piston that ride in the bore (4446544 or 04446544 still available, Rockauto also often has them). Also inspect the piston & bore for damage (there are a couple of types of $40 repair kits from Sonnax, if so). The accumulator cover should be about $8 from Mopar dealers or ebay and the two sealing rings are about $4 each (though some sellers mark them way up). Note that different transmission mechanics and parts suppliers call this either a "cover" or a "cap," so in this post, I'll use both terms; they mean the same thing.

I assume that transmission mechanics know about this repair with info in their repair databases, but there doesn't seem to be much searchable information online, except for an obscure Chrysler "Satisfaction Notification," and a good post on a Jeep Wrangler forum. I have not been able to find a TSB on this for the Intrepid/LH cars, and it would have had to be released around 2005, when the problem was finally corrected. Transmission shops that know about this defect in the old accumulator cover also have a way to diagnose that fluid is leaking in the low/reverse piston bore. There are other internal problems that can cause no reverse, but this issue is quite likely, and obvioiusly much simpler to repair than pulling and rebuilding parts of the transmission.

Important: The repair may apply to all of the Chrysler Ultradrive transmissions before a certain date, but in particular the 42LE/A606 in the Intrepid/LH cars and the similar A604/41TE and the 42RLE (modified for rear drive).

This repair really should be a "How-To" here and on the Jeep and other forums, but it will show up in a Google search for the transmission numbers and "no reverse." Please add any comments or other info. While I wasn't able to find an LH car Technical Service Bulletin on this, there is a Chrysler "Customer Satisfaction Notification" posted online from October 2002 for the 41TE/ A604 transmission, which originally used the same defective low/reverse accumulator piston cover as in the 42LE/A606.

History:
Before 2005, the 42LE, 42RLE, and similar Chrysler transmissions used a two-piece cover/cap assembly for the low/reverse accumulator piston. It was made up of an aluminum cap (p/n 04431617, earlier just 4431617) and an O-ring (6501549 or 06501549) that fit in a groove in the cap. These are pictured (as below) in the 1st Gen Parts Catalog transmission section illustrations under "Accumulator Pistons & Springs." A similar illustration with the same two-piece cover and O-ring is in the 2004 Intrepid Parts Catalog.

The low/reverse accumulator is held in its bore in the transmission case with the cover and a snap ring shown (06501695 or 6501695), whereas the other two accumulator pistons (overdrive and underdrive) are loose and will fall out (along with their center springs) when the valve body is removed. (There is also another accumulator piston that is contained in the side of valve body.)

That O-ring on the accumulator cap was prone to breakage, causing high-pressure fluid leakage around it in reverse; so in 2002 Chysler issued "Customer Satisfaction Notification No. B27 Transaxle Low/Reverse Accumulator Cover" (pdf link below).

Notification quote: "Subject - The transaxle low/reverse accumulator cover O-ring on about 14,600 of the above vehicles [with 41TE transaxle] may become dislodged. This could cause the transaxle to slip in low and or/reverse."

However, because it could still recur after installing a new cap and O-Ring, this notification didn't really permanently solve the problem. However, it does usefully go through the whole processs of removing the valve body for access to the low/reverse accumulator piston. And by the way, it also likely applied to A LOT more than the 14,600 cars listed.

Below is a link to a page where a guy helpfully posted the Chrysler notification. His page also has many Dodge Neon TSBs (it had the 41TE transmission). I've also attached a copy of the pdf below. :
DaimlerChrysler
Customer Satisfaction Notification No. B27 Transaxle Low/Reverse Accumulator Cover, October 2002

Sometime around 2004-2005, a one-piece replacement cap (04431617AB) with an integral bonded Viton lower half (with sealing lip) was released to solve the problem. This part is still available through Mopar dealers and sometimes on ebay, and there are also aftermarket versions from the transmission parts suppliers.

When they did this cap update, Chrysler may have issued TSBs for every car that had the old (possibly leaking) low/reverse accumulator caps, especially as a follow-up to the previous Customer Satisfaction Notification. However, when I checked a while back I wasn't able to find one for the Intrepid on the Alldata database, so it may not exist. If anyone has a TSB title/number for this fix on any Chrysler cars, please post it. It would have been around 2005.

Below are the Mopar parts catalog Illustrations, showing the substitution.
(As I mentioned I've labeled it a "cover" but it is correctly "Cap, Accumulator" in the Parts Catalog) Second Illustration also shows the other accumulator pistons for comparison (no caps, and loose in the bores).

Image




Image


A good very good post on this repair from 2015 with photos of the old and new cap is at the link below to the Jeep Wrangler Forum. In this case, even the snap ring had broken, and the poster discusses the Sonnax kit available if there is any bore damage. I've have not seen this repair covered anywhere else online. So thanks very much to Weirdracin on the Wrangler Forum.
42RLE Slipping in Reverse sometimes - possible solution

---------------------
Attachment below of the linked Dodge Neon TSB on the original problem with the cap O-ring failing:
DaimlerChrysler
Customer Satisfaction Notification No. B27 Transaxle Low/Reverse Accumulator Cover, October 2002
28-B27-02.pdf :
 

Attachments

#3 ·
@pt500 I think in this thread or the referenced wrangler thread there was an indication that later transmissions had the one piece cap. I assume the cap is the piece leaning on the sharpie?

A lot of good diagrams of internal parts but I don't see any of where to reach this accumlator in the transmission and whether you could do it with the transmission in the (jeep) in this case. This is a 2011 wrangler that was one of the later models to have the 42 RLE and presumably might have had the updated cap so maybe I shouldn't imagine I could get out of no reverse this easy. Just following up for any knowledge and the wrangler thread is kind of old so I don't know what kind of response i'll get rebooting it.

But a great find and glad you brought the link forward in this thread.

thanks AT

PS This transmission was "rebuilt" about a year and a half ago. I assume that if it had the old style cap it would have been replaced at that point although I'm not always sure that "rebuilt" means doing more than some minimum to fix obvious problems rather than complete refitting.
 
#4 · (Edited)
Edited/corrected below: When removing the valve body (after removing the filter), just remove the several hex bolts attaching it to the transmission. Do not remove the black Torx screws; they hold the valve body together. See the Factory Service Manual and Youtube videos on the 42LE or A606 valve body for further clarification on removing the valve body.
-----
Replying to archibald tuttle (answers to questions below):

Sorry I'm late getting back to this - I don't have notifications set up for the discussion threads (too busy with other life stuff). For others that might be reading this, I will include a lot of basic info that you may already know.

I would think that your 2011 Jeep transmission had the updated cover/cap. If your transmission was rebuilt, I suppose it is possible (but ulikely) that they somehow used an old style cover/cap and O-ring in the low/reverse accumulator bore if those were included in the rebuild kit instead of a new-style cover. A rebuild should have replaced all the wear parts including all the internal seals that I believe can also cause no reverse. A good shop would use a brand-name "master rebuild kit" that has several dozen parts (you can see pictures of all the parts in the kits on ebay if you search on 42LE or A606 plus "rebuild kit.")

For some reason I don't think the Mopar technical service bulletin (TSB) I listed ever showed up on the Intrepid TSB list and maybe not on some of the Jeep TSB lists either.

To clarify again, as I said the above bulletin was BEFORE they came up with the permanent fix by using the new one-piece cover (without the separate O-Ring) with the AB suffix (4431617AB or 04431616AB). 4431617 without the suffix was the old cover that used the separate (flimsly) O-ring that broke. So the parts they are listing in the TSB are just replacing the broken O-ring and cover with the same old style. I couldn't find a TSB that references the new cover, but there must be one somewhere. Sonnax and Transtec may also have published something in their transmisson service bulletins for shops.

A good transmission shop would obviously check for this and install a the new cover and snap ring if needed. As the guy in the Jeep thread mentioned, there are also Sonnax brand repair kits if the accumulator bore is worn at high mileage. The ATRA certified trans shop guys should know all about the variouis fixes on the 42LE/A606 transmissions - they use Sonnax, Transtec, etc. parts all the time and and have access to their database with all the bulletins.

By the way, I think that Jeeps used on rough roads or off-road might be especially susceptible to the old cap and O-ring failure because maybe the low/reverse accumulator piston and springs could bounce on the top of the cap in a big bump and break the old O-ring like the guy showed in the Jeep thread (but that is just speculation).

As I recall, there were also some old threads on this website that cover other causes of 42LE/A606 "no reverse," but I wasn't able to locate them with the advanced search function (it isn't great). They may have been archived and no longer searchable. The other Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep websites probably also have threads on the subject since so many vehicles used that transmission.

One other easy thing that a trans shop can check is the two transmission speed sensors (they screw into the side of the transmission). I believe if at least one of the speed sensors (output sensor?) is bad (or its wiring\connector\nearby ground wires deteriorated, causing electrical noise), it can lock out reverse because it tells the trans control module that the vehicle is in forward motion. The speed sensors and cables are easy for a shop to check and replace/repair. Good sensors are from Standard Motor Products or Echlin (NAPA brand) - but get their regular line, not the economy line. Also for an electrical cause, a check of all cabling running to the transmission, solenoid switch, and trans control module is called for, as well as checking the ground cables for good attachment and any deterioration.

For a complete diagnosis a good ATRA certified shop (atra.com) should be able to do a scan for transmission diagnostic codes with their Snap-On (or similar) scanner. A shop can also do pressure tap tests tests on the transmission without removing it. You can't really "diagnose" anything by removing the transmission; that would be like pulling the engine to do a compression test. All the transmission tests and a bunch of diagnostic tables and flow charts are in the Mopar Factory Service Manuals for the car year in the transmission section (pdfs on this site for Intrepids and maybe on the Jeep sites too). There are also more detailed Mopar supplementary transmission service manuals for the cars and Jeeps (sometimes available on ebay). The shops likely have these supplementary manuals and bulletins in their databases.

Your questions:

Yes the later one-piece cover/cap is the part on the yellow sharpie shown in the photo.

As I wrote, I believe the new covers have been used in production transmissions starting around 2004-2005, but the best way to confirm that for Jeeps would be to look at the exploded view valve body parts diagrams in the dated Mopar parts catalog for the year of the vehicle and compare them to two I posted above that are from a single page right after the valve body parts listing. There are some of those parts catalogs on this site for Second Generation Intrepids of those years in pdf format, and the Jeep and other Mopar car websites may have them also for the later years.

As far as servicing, the accumulator bore where the cover resides (and holds in the piston and springs) is in a cylindrical bore in the transmission above the valve body as shown in the TSB pdf I linked to and attached. And no, the transmission does not have to be removed to remove the valve body and access the accumulator bores (there are three above the valve body and one contained in the side of it). The Factory Service Manuals (some in pdfs also on the websites) explain the procedure. The trans shops do it all the time if the diagnosis indicates a possible valve body problem. They can also just remove/replace the solenoid switch (often called the solenoid pack) mounted to the valve body if the diagnosis indicates a possible problem there - remanufactured ones are still available for that. (On early versions of the Chrylser Ultradrive transmission the solenoid switch may have been mounted externally on top of the transmisson.)

The four accumulator pistons have two inexpensive teflon rings that can wear, but are easily replaced. I think the accumulator bores can also wear in normal service, but like the guy in the Jeep post said, there are Sonnax repair kits for that. If there is a problem with the valve body itself that can't be repaired with a different type of Sonnax kit, remanufactued valve bodies are probably still available to the trans shops, but they are probably at least a couple hundred dollars.

I assume that you will be taking it to a transmission shop, which is really best. The ATRA trans shop mechanics know all this stuff. But this is what would be invovled to check for the updated cover and accumulator bore wear/damage:

The valve body is on the bottom of the transmission and can be accessed by dropping the pan and draining the fluid, then removing the filter (very messy and can spill trans fluid all over). There is a very slow way to first siphon some of the fluid out of the fill tube first so it isn't so messy. And then to get to the accumulator bores and pistons (one of which has the cover which is held in place by the snap ring) you have to remove a few bolts supporting the valve body. Do not remove the black Torx screws; they hold the valve body together - see the FSM and Youtube videos for clarification on removing the valve body. Some of the bolts may be different lengths (can't recall); if so, you've obviously got to pay attention to that and record the different hole locations. And you also have to do a procedure explained in the FSM to position the shift linkage/manual shaft to get the valve body to drop without hanging up - a bit tricky. It has to be in the same position for insertion of the valve body.

The sealing ring on the shifter shaft that extends up from the valve body may also cause some slight resistance when lowering the valve body. This "seal, manual valve lever" (p/n 4412836 or 04412836) along with another small "seal, 2nd & 4th clutch feed" (4412291 or 04412291) and a tiny cone-shaped filter "screen, regulator valve" (3878313 or 03878313), all on the valve body, can can also be replaced with aftermarket parts that are still available to the shops or online. They are inexpensive.

So it is a difficult, tedious, messy job on your back at home, but taking off the valve body to check for this failure in the low/reverse accumulator cover and any accumulator bore wear/damage is actually a relatively easy job for a trans shop with the car on a lift.

As I said, a good ATRA-certified transmission shop (for shops, see American Transmission Rebuilders Association, ATRA.com), should be able to access all the info on this fix as well as the other possible ones for no reverse in their service bulletin databases (published by both both Mopar and the transmission parts suppliers).

As far as the parts, the accumulator pistons and teflon rings are still available from the trans shop's parts suppliers if those are needed. There are aftermarket parts, but I believe the Mopar interchange part numbers are 4446620 or 04446620 for the accumulator piston and 4446544 or 04446544 for the teflon rings (2 on each piston). All the parts are shown in the Mopar parts catalog exploded diagrams and tables (as I said pdfs for different years on this site and probably the Jeep sites too).

And as I said the new cover part number is 4431617AB or 04431617AB (either is correct), or I think the aftermarket numbers are A92949A and B82053. The snap ring number is either 6501695 or 06501695 and if you've got an old broken one to match it is very close to the size of a standard snap ring size available at good hardware stores which may work. (But check the exact thickness with the old one so it will fit in the slot). Both parts are still available through local and some online Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep Mopar dealers. If you want to buy them to take a look or discuss with the mechanics at a shop, ebay sellers also sometimes have them. Here are a couple links as of 6/23 (same seller):

Transtec B82053 Cover, Accumulator Low/Reverse
$7.56 shipped

Mopar D92896 Snap Ring; Reverse Accumulator Cover A604 (41TE), 42 LE, 41TE, 41AE
$3.35 shipped

If you take it into a shop, let us know what they diagnose and repair for the no reverse.

The LH cars were a great leap forward for Chrysler, but Lee Iacocca could have saved us all a lot of trouble if he had the Chrysler engineers do more stress testing on the various Ultradrive transmissions.
 
#5 ·
Replying to archibald tuttle (answers to questions below):

Sorry I'm late getting back to this - I don't have notifications set up for the discussion threads (too busy with other life stuff). For others that might be reading this, I will include a lot of basic info that you may already know.

I would think that your 2011 Jeep transmission had the updated cover/cap. If your transmission was rebuilt, I suppose it is possible (but ulikely) that they somehow used an old style cover/cap and O-ring in the low/reverse accumulator bore if those were included in the rebuild kit instead of a new-style cover. A rebuild should have replaced all the wear parts including all the internal seals that I believe can also cause no reverse. A good shop would use a brand-name "master rebuild kit" that has several dozen parts (you can see pictures of all the parts in the kits on ebay if you search on 42LE or A606 plus "rebuild kit.")

For some reason I don't think the Mopar technical service bulletin (TSB) I listed ever showed up on the Intrepid TSB list and maybe not on some of the Jeep TSB lists either.

To clarify again, as I said the above bulletin was BEFORE they came up with the permanent fix by using the new one-piece cover (without the separate O-Ring) with the AB suffix (4431617AB or 04431616AB). 4431617 without the suffix was the old cover that used the separate (flimsly) O-ring that broke. So the parts they are listing in the TSB are just replacing the broken O-ring and cover with the same old style. I couldn't find a TSB that references the new cover, but there must be one somewhere. Sonnax and Transtec may also have published something in their transmisson service bulletins for shops.

A good transmission shop would obviously check for this and install a the new cover and snap ring if needed. As the guy in the Jeep thread mentioned, there are also Sonnax brand repair kits if the accumulator bore is worn at high mileage. The ATRA certified trans shop guys should know all about the variouis fixes on the 42LE/A606 transmissions - they use Sonnax, Transtec, etc. parts all the time and and have access to their database with all the bulletins.

By the way, I think that Jeeps used on rough roads or off-road might be especially susceptible to the old cap and O-ring failure because maybe the low/reverse accumulator piston and springs could bounce on the top of the cap in a big bump and break the old O-ring like the guy showed in the Jeep thread (but that is just speculation).

As I recall, there were also some old threads on this website that cover other causes of 42LE/A606 "no reverse," but I wasn't able to locate them with the advanced search function (it isn't great). They may have been archived and no longer searchable. The other Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep websites probably also have threads on the subject since so many vehicles used that transmission.

One other easy thing that a trans shop can check is the two transmission speed sensors (they screw into the side of the transmission). I believe if at least one of the speed sensors (output sensor?) is bad (or it's wiring or connector deteriorated), it can lock out reverse because it tells the trans control module that the vehicle is in forward motioin. The speed sensors and cables are easy for a shop to check and replace with good ones like from Standard Motor Products or Echlin (NAPA brand) - their regular line, not the economy line. Also for an electrical cause, a check of all cabling to the transmission and trans control module is called for, as well as checking the ground cables.

For a complete diagnosis a good ATRA certified shop (atra.com) should be able to do a scan for transmission diagnostic codes with their Snap-On (or similar) scanner. A shop can also do pressure tap tests tests on the transmission without removing it. You can't really "diagnose" anything by removing the transmission; that would be like pulling the engine to do a compression test. All the transmission tests and bunch of diagnostic tables and flow charts are in the Mopar Factory Service Manuals in the transmission section (pdfs on this site for Intrepids and maybe on the Jeep sites too.)

Your questions:

Yes the later one-piece cover/cap is the part on the yellow sharpie.

As I wrote, I believe the new covers have been used in production transmissions starting around 2004-2005, but the best way to confirm that for Jeeps would be to look at the exploded view valve body parts diagrams in the dated Mopar parts catalog for the year of the vehicle and compare them to two I posted above that are from a single page right after the valve body parts listing. There are some of those parts catalogs on this site for Second Generation Intrepids of those years in pdf format, and the Jeep and other Mopar car websites may have them also for the later years.

As far as servicing, the accumulator bore where the cover resides (and holds in the piston and springs) is in a cylindrical bore in the transmission above the valve body as shown in the TSB pdf I linked to and attached. And no, the transmission does not have to be removed to remove the valve body and access the accumulator bores (there are three above the valve body and one contained in the side of it). The Factory Service Manuals (some in pdfs also on the websites) explain the procedure. The trans shops do it all the time if the diagnosis indicates just a possible valve body problem. They can also just remove/replace the solenoid pack above the transmission if the diagnosis indicates a possible problem there - remanufactured ones are still available for that. The four accumulator pistons have two inexpensive teflon rings that can wear, but are easily replaced. I think the accumulator bores can also wear in normal service, but like the guy in the Jeep post said, there are Sonnax repair kits for that. If there is a problem with the valve body itself that can't be repaired with a different type of Sonnax kit, remanufactued valve bodies are probably still available to the trans shops but they are a few hundred dollars.

I assume that you will be taking it to a transmission shop, which is really best. The ATRA trans shop mechanics know all this stuff. But this is what would be invovled to check for the updated cover and accumulator bore wear/damage:

The valve body is on the bottom of the transmission and can be accessed by dropping the pan and draining the fluid, then removing the filter (very messy and can spill trans fluid all over). There is a slow way to siphon the fluid out of the fill tube first so it isn't so messy. And then to get to the accumulator bores and pistons (one of which has the cover which is held in place by the snap ring) you have to remove several Torx screws supporting the valve body. As I recall, I think (?) some screws may be different length, so you have to pay attention to that. And you also have to do some careful things explained in the FSM with the shift linkage to get it to drop without hanging up - a bit of a pain.

The two other accumulator pistons with springs inside are loose and can fall out when the valve body is dropped down. The aluminum pistons and their sealing rings can be damaged if you drop them (the rings are replaceable). Then you can access the low/reverse accumulator (which is supposed to be held in by a snap ring, but as the Jeep post said, it can be broken). Those other two loose accumulors are tricky to get back in properly - you have to use a thin rigid plastic sheet to hold them in place as you bolt the valve body back on with the several screws.

So it is a difficult, tedious, messy job on your back at home, but taking off the valve body to check for this failure in the low/reverse accumulator cover and any bore wear/damage is actually a relatively easy job for a trans shop with the car on a lift.

As I said, a good ATRA-certified transmission shop (American Transmission Rebuilders Association, ATRA.com), should be able to access all the info on this fix as well as the other possible ones for no reverse in their service bulletin databases (published by both both Mopar and the transmission parts suppliers).

As far as the parts, the accumulator pistons and teflon rings are still available from the trans shop's parts suppliers if those are needed. There are aftermarket parts, but I believe the Mopar interchange part numbers are 4446620 or 04446620 for the piston and 4446544 or 04446544 for the teflon rings (2 on each piston). All the parts are shown in the Mopar parts catalog exploded diagrams and tables (as I said pdfs for different years on this site and probably the Jeep sites too).

And as I said the new cover part number is 4431617AB or 04431617AB (either is correct), or I think the aftermarket numbers are A92949A and B82053. The snap ring number is either 6501695 or 06501695 and if you've got an old broken one to match it is very close to the size of a standard snap ring size available at good hardware stores which may work (but double check the thickness). Both parts are still available through local and online Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep Mopar dealers. If you want to buy them to take a look or discuss with the mechanics at a shop, ebay sellers also often have them. Here are a couple links as of 6/23 (same seller):

Transtec B82053 Cover, Accumulator Low/Reverse
$7.56 shipped

Mopar D92896 Snap Ring; Reverse Accumulator Cover A604 (41TE), 42 LE, 41TE, 41AE
$3.35 shipped

If you take it into a shop, let us know what they diagnose and repair for the no reverse. Lee Iacocca could have saved us all a lot of trouble if he had the Chrysler engineers do a few more months stress testing on the 42LE/A606 transmission.
You have quite extensive knowledge of the subject - an area that I know very close to nothing about.

I will comment on this one group of sentences:
One other easy thing that a trans shop can check is the two transmission speed sensors (they screw into the side of the transmission). I believe if at least one of the speed sensors (output sensor?) is bad (or it's wiring or connector deteriorated), it can lock out reverse because it tells the trans control module that the vehicle is in forward motion
The speed sensor output signals are single-wire binary pulses (5 volts, ground, 5 volts, ground,...). I believe that any credible failure of one of the speed sensors will result only in a reduced number (usually zero, never more) of pulses. Also, the sensor output signals contain no direction (forward vs. reverse) information. The only speed signal schemes that I know of that also provide direction (in addition to speed amplitude) information are those with quadrature signals (utilizing multiple wires/signals per "sensor"), and the sensors on these cars are single-signal/wire sensors.

Having said all of that, no reason not to verify that the speed sensors are properly working.

I'm open to being told that I misunderstood some of what you said or that anything I said is not correct. And this is only a small part of all that you said (which, again, I have close to zero experiential/practical knowledge about). 👍
 
#11 · (Edited)
I think they are saying in this article below that at least on the AW50-40/42LE transmission it is is also possible to swap the input and output speed sensor connectors, which would also cause no reverse. If so, then best to only replace one sensor at a time to not confuse the two wires and connectors. And/or label them.

Edit 1: I looked at the spare sensors I have, and on the 1st Gen Intrepid 42LE at least, yes the pins and plugs are identical, however the connector locking tab is 180 degrees different. But I supposed you could force it and mistakenly swap them.

Aisin AW 50-40/42LE No Reverse After Overhaul

Edit 2: Here's another article below that spells out what the transmission control module (TCM) may also be doing on the 42LE and similar transmissions when it locks out reverse due to a faulty output speed sensor signal:

"The cause may be that during installation, the vehicle-speed sensor was placed into the location of the turbine-shaft-speed sensor on the case. This will create a vehicle-speed reading in the Park position because of the turbine shaft’s rotation in the Park position. The transmission control module will cancel Reverse application by turning on solenoid 1 to block the application of the B3 clutch, which is the low/reverse clutch. Once the selector is placed into Drive, the turbine shaft will come to a stop and Reverse will apply from the Drive position. "

Transmission Digest March 2005 (my favorite magazine for light reading)